On 17/08/15 07:20, Andrew Pinder wrote:
If I understand the position correctly, UnixLib is part of the
development environment you use and isn't part of RISCOS itself? So
once it has been fixed I won't have to install an update on this
machine?
UnixLib implements the C standard library and so
In message <20150814072335.GB10674@somnambulist.local>
on 14 Aug 2015 Daniel Silverstone
wrote:
> We've already found what we believe to be a bug in UNIXLib and we are
> investingating it -- it can cause the browser to segfault and thus vanish
> without apparent error.
> Sadly I can't give you
In article ,
David Pitt wrote:
> "Gerald Dodson", on 13 Aug, wrote:
> > Has any one else had this version fail?
> Try #2911 or later.
Well, http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/athletics/33867962 now seems to be OK
with #2916. Is that the answer you were looking for?
"Gerald Dodson", on 13 Aug, wrote:
> Has any one else had this version fail?
Try #2911 or later.
--
David Pitt
In article <20150814072335.GB10674@somnambulist.local>,
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> t is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
> undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If
> you encounter issues, turn JS off after loading your browser (n
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:56:23 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
> I should have been clearer, I meant JavaScript itself is working, sites that
> crash on RISC OS didn't crash on Ubuntu.
As Rob said -- RISC OS' UNIXLib is suffering a little right now. The JS engine
uses setjmp()/longjmp() to do exceptio
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
> > Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
> > > > Has any one else had this version fail?
> > >
> > > It is distinctly likely t
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36 +0100, David Pitt wrote:
> Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
> > > Has any one else had this version fail?
> >
> > It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
> > u
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 09:31:36AM +0100, David Pitt wrote:
> Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
> > > Has any one else had this version fail?
> >
> > It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
> >
Daniel Silverstone, on 14 Aug, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
> > Has any one else had this version fail?
>
> It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
> undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If
>
On 14 Aug 2015 Daniel Silverstone
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
>> Has any one else had this version fail?
> It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
> undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. I
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 22:56:41 +0100, Gerald Dodson wrote:
> Has any one else had this version fail?
It is distinctly likely that current CI builds will cause issues. We're
undergoing a *huge* JS transition and forcing JS on while we do it. If you
encounter issues, turn JS off after loading yo
"Gerald Dodson", on 13 Aug, wrote:
> Has any one else had this version fail?
Currently NetSurf starts with JavaScript enabled irrespective of any Choices
saved previously. A new JavaScript engine is being incorporated but at the
moment this is "work in progress" by which I mean it crashes a lot w
Has any one else had this version fail?
Gerald
14 matches
Mail list logo
