Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-24 Thread David H Wild
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has > > a spell checker. > > Not sure if Edit does. > No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers more trouble than they're > worth. I don't think th

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread David J. Ruck
On 13 May 2008 Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13 May 2008 David J. Ruck wrote: >> Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote: >>> Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has a spell checker. >>> Not sure

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread John-Mark Bell
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Richard Porter wrote: On 13 May 2008 John-Mark Bell wrote: On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote: The only (occasional) way around this is to adjust click on the submit button to submit into a new window, but sometimes this doesn't work. There shouldn't be any differ

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Richard Porter
On 13 May 2008 John-Mark Bell wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote: >> I know what would be good >> >> When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into >> forms. ... > Increase the memory cache size to enhance the chances of clicking back > retaining the form d

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread John-Mark Bell
On Tue, 13 May 2008, Paul Vigay wrote: I know what would be good When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and click submit, only to find that I've mistyped the captcha or some other error has occurre

Re: Even more OT (was: Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf)

2008-05-13 Thread Dr Peter Young
On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill wrote: Btw, it's "a criterion" - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and semantic errors. >>> I hope one day someone will come

OT (was: Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf)

2008-05-13 Thread Tim Hill
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill wrote: > >> Btw, it's "a criterion" - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and > >> semantic errors. > > I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry checker. ;-) > I knew someone woul

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Richard Porter
On 13 May 2008 Tim Hill wrote: >> Btw, it's "a criterion" - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and >> semantic errors. > I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry checker. ;-) I knew someone would say that! Using the right word or ending instead of the wrong one isn't pedantry

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Tim Hill
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [Snip] > Btw, it's "a criterion" - spell checkers don't spot grammatical and > semantic errors. I hope one day someone will come along with a pedantry checker. ;-) -- Tim Hill, www.timil.com

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Richard Porter
On 13 May 2008 David J. Ruck wrote: > Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote: >> >>> Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has >>> a spell checker. >> >>> Not sure if Edit does. >> >> No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers m

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread David J. Ruck
Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote: > > > Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has > > a spell checker. > > > Not sure if Edit does. > > No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers more trouble than they're > worth. I find th

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Richard Porter
On 13 May 2008 Kevin Wells wrote: > Another bonus if using StrongED doing it that way is that StrongED has a > spell checker. > Not sure if Edit does. No, it doesn't, but I find spell checkers more trouble than they're worth. -- _ |_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Kevin Wells
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Richard Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 13 May 2008 Paul Vigay wrote: > >> I know what would be good > >> When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into >> forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and c

Re: Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Richard Porter
On 13 May 2008 Paul Vigay wrote: > I know what would be good > When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into > forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and click > submit, only to find that I've mistyped the captcha or some other error has > occur

Another suggestion for NetSurf

2008-05-13 Thread Paul Vigay
I know what would be good When you click 'back' on NetSurf, it could keep any data entered into forms. There are numerous times when I complete a lengthy form and click submit, only to find that I've mistyped the captcha or some other error has occurred, and the site solution is to click back