On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 00:24 +0100, John-Mark Bell wrote:
> All the specifications say that user agents should refuse to accept
> domain cookies that do not have a '.' in their domain.
Ugh. That's badly worded. What I meant was, "... accept domain cookies
that do not have more than one '.' in the
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 21:19 +0100, Dave Higton wrote:
> In message <1255628822.25071.29.ca...@duiker>
> John-Mark Bell wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:41 +0100, Dave Symes wrote:
> >
> > > FWIW. I'm using the latest NetSurf and it works perfectly okay with LTSB,
> > > and I do ha
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:17:59 +0100
Dave Higton wrote:
> The relationship between banks and customers isn't like it used to
> be a generation ago.
Everybody has a horror story about every bank. Let's leave it at that,
and talk about things that are related to NetSurf.
B.
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:59:31 +0100, John wrote:
> On 15 Oct, John-Mark Bell wrote:
> > You should have no .co.uk cookies at all. I strongly recommend that you
> > delete them. By rights, NetSurf should never have accepted them in the
> > first place. Unfortunately, this is yet another case where
On 15 Oct, John-Mark Bell wrote:
> You should have no .co.uk cookies at all. I strongly recommend that you
> delete them. By rights, NetSurf should never have accepted them in the
> first place. Unfortunately, this is yet another case where following any
> of the published specifications doesn't a
In article <2425c8aa50.davehig...@dsl.pipex.com>, Dave
Higton wrote:
> In message <501e2bj.mccart...@blueyonder.co.uk> John
> McCartney wrote:
> > In article
> ><1255613403.4ad723dbca...@netmail.pipex.net>, dave
> >higton wrote:
> > > Move your account to a bank that does
In article <8bc4c8aa50.davehig...@dsl.pipex.com>, Dave
Higton wrote:
> > I can't speak for others, but the amount of work
> > required to transfer all My/Our banking stuff elsewhere
> > doesn't bear thinking about.
> Maybe you're a business customer?
I imagine that that is what Dave S is talkin
In article <2425c8aa50.davehig...@dsl.pipex.com>, Dave
Higton wrote:
> In message <501e2bj.mccart...@blueyonder.co.uk> John
> McCartney wrote:
> > In article
> ><1255613403.4ad723dbca...@netmail.pipex.net>, dave
> >higton wrote:
> >
> > > Move your account to a bank that
In article <1255628822.25071.29.ca...@duiker>,
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:41 +0100, Dave Symes wrote:
> > FWIW. I'm using the latest NetSurf and it works perfectly okay with
> > LTSB, and I do have a number of .co.uk cookies.
> You should have no .co.uk cookies at all. I
In message <1255628822.25071.29.ca...@duiker>
John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:41 +0100, Dave Symes wrote:
>
> > FWIW. I'm using the latest NetSurf and it works perfectly okay with LTSB,
> > and I do have a number of .co.uk cookies.
>
> You should have no .co.uk cookie
In message <50aab4ebffd...@triffid.co.uk>
Dave Symes wrote:
> In article <1255613403.4ad723dbca...@netmail.pipex.net>,
>dave higton wrote:
> [Snippy]
> > Move your account to a bank that does support better browsers.
> > I use Barclays, which has long been fine.
>
> Tsk,tsk!
> So
In message <501e2bj.mccart...@blueyonder.co.uk>
John McCartney wrote:
> In article <1255613403.4ad723dbca...@netmail.pipex.net>,
>dave higton wrote:
>
> > Move your account to a bank that does support better
> > browsers. I use Barclays, which has long been fine.
>
> Rather a
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:41 +0100, Dave Symes wrote:
> FWIW. I'm using the latest NetSurf and it works perfectly okay with LTSB,
> and I do have a number of .co.uk cookies.
You should have no .co.uk cookies at all. I strongly recommend that you
delete them. By rights, NetSurf should never have ac
In article <1255613403.4ad723dbca...@netmail.pipex.net>,
dave higton wrote:
[Snippy]
> Move your account to a bank that does support better browsers.
> I use Barclays, which has long been fine.
Tsk,tsk!
Sorry sport, but that really is a most silly answer.
I can't speak for others, but the amo
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:30:03 +0100
dave higton wrote:
> Move your account to a bank that does support better browsers.
> I use Barclays, which has long been fine.
LloydsTSB have long had the policy that they do not depend on any
specific browser (but they do recommend), and any JavaScript is
opt
In article <1255613403.4ad723dbca...@netmail.pipex.net>,
dave higton wrote:
> Quoting John McCartney :
> > In article <7519b6a950.thebe...@sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
> >Geoffrey Baxendale
> > wrote:
> >
> > > LloydsTSB has recently stopped working for me after
> > > years of trouble free op
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:03:11 +0100
"David J. Ruck" wrote:
> Moutusi De wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > I am trying to build netsurf-2.1(I believe this stable release)
> > source code in linux with gtk.
>
> Didn't we have a Net Surf Developers mailing list to separate user
> feedback from building and t
Moutusi De wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to build netsurf-2.1(I believe this stable release) source
code in linux with gtk.
Didn't we have a Net Surf Developers mailing list to separate user
feedback from building and technical issues? I haven't received anything
on it in a long time, so I don
Jim Nagel wrote:
please, if sending a private copy to somebody while posting to the
list, put the list in the TO field and the private copy in CC or BCC?
Just noticed its Thunderbird doing that. On some lists the Reply To All
button replies back To the list as expected, on others such as this
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:21:37 +0530
Moutusi De wrote:
> I am trying to build netsurf-2.1(I believe this stable release)
> source code in linux with gtk.
> I am getting following error
Please read Docs/BUILDING-GTK for instructions on how to obtain
NetSurf's dependencies, and turn off functional
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 19:21 +0530, Moutusi De wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am trying to build netsurf-2.1(I believe this stable release) source
> code in linux with gtk.
> I am getting following error:
> netsurf/css/css.c:1539: undefined reference to `css_parser_Alloc'
> netsurf/css/css.c:1552: undefine
dave higton wrote:
Move your account to a bank that does support better browsers.
I use Barclays, which has long been fine.
HSBC is NetSurf friendly*, and doesn't require javascript to use the web
banking features.
*Except for the time they thought NetSurf was a virus and locked us all
out
Hi All,
I am trying to build netsurf-2.1(I believe this stable release) source
code in linux with gtk.
I am getting following error:
netsurf/css/css.c:1539: undefined reference to `css_parser_Alloc'
netsurf/css/css.c:1552: undefined reference to `css_parser_'
netsurf/css/css.c:1556: undefined
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 19:05 +0530, Moutusi De wrote:
> Moutusi De wrote:
> > Moutusi De wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I have compiled Netsurf {"netsurf-r9577.tar.gz"}
> >> I have built it with Frame buffer option.
> >> {Just to give a background: we are working on an embedded hand held
> >> device
Moutusi De wrote:
Moutusi De wrote:
Hi All,
I have compiled Netsurf {"netsurf-r9577.tar.gz"}
I have built it with Frame buffer option.
{Just to give a background: we are working on an embedded hand held
device, with internet connectivity}
I couldn't find any option to configure the proxy or
Quoting John McCartney :
> In article <7519b6a950.thebe...@sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
>Geoffrey Baxendale
> wrote:
>
> > LloydsTSB has recently stopped working for me after years
> > of trouble free operation.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/15/lloyds_tsb_online_banking_firefox/
>
>
Jim Nagel wrote on 15 Oct:
> Steve Fryatt wrote on 14 Oct :
>> Jim Nagel wrote:
>>> Rob Kendrick wrote on 14 Oct:
>>>
You mean you don't filter based on "To or CC" as well as "List-Id"? :)
>>>
>>> exactly. of course i could filter on all those fields. but then when
>>> somebody send
In article <7519b6a950.thebe...@sarno.freeserve.co.uk>,
Geoffrey Baxendale
wrote:
> LloydsTSB has recently stopped working for me after years
> of trouble free operation.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/15/lloyds_tsb_online_banking_firefox/
It seems we're not the only ones to have suffe
28 matches
Mail list logo
