Re: [Netstack] Quantum Common Configuration Issues

On 06/11/2012 07:38 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: Hi Gary, I'd like to make sure that its easy to have common options across different plugins (e.g., database options, DHCP options, etc.), so I think this approach makes sense, at least at a high-leve. I'll take a look at the review as well. Than

[Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

Hi, During our last project meeting there was some interest in introducing "review days" for Quantum core devs. I see multiple benefits in this approach: 1) Contributors would know which core member the need to contact on a given days for soliciting a review for their patches 2) Predictable code

Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

+1-netstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote: -To: openst...@lists.launchpad.netFrom: Salvatore Orlando Sent by: netstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.netDate: 06/11/2012 05:26PMCc: netstack@lists.launchpad.netSubject: [Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for

Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

+1 Yes, It will work. display information on wiki would be best option. May be Dan has some thought on this. Thanks, Hitesh On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Yong Sheng Gong wrote: > > +1 > > > -netstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote: - > To: openst...@lists.lau

[Netstack] Bug 1008029 - more specifically MAC allocation

Hi, If possible I would like to address the bug as follows: 1. When a network is created the user will be able to configure a base MAC address. If a base MAC address is not allocated by the user then a base MAC will be read from the Quantum configuration file (the default will be "fa:16:3e:00:0

Re: [Netstack] Bug 1008029 - more specifically MAC allocation

Hi,I thought melange will do this. We also need IP allocations from melange.-netstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net wrote: -To: "" From: Gary Kotton Sent by: netstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.netDate: 06/11/2012 06:35PMSubject: [Netstack] Bug 1008029 - mo

Re: [Netstack] Bug 1008029 - more specifically MAC allocation

On 06/11/2012 02:35 PM, Yong Sheng Gong wrote: Hi, I thought melange will do this. We also need IP allocations from melange. Hi, You are correct, this is done my Melange. The bug is for Folsom 2 as part of the Melange integration. I guess that it was opened to ensure that it would not be neg

Re: [Netstack] Provider Networks extension advice (was Re: [Openstack] question on get_network_details api call)

On 06/10/2012 03:19 PM, Irena Berezovsky wrote: > Hi Robert, > May I add to your question also considerations regarding network creation - > POST operation? > I may be wrong in my understanding, but it seems to me that in case of > RequestExtension it will be possible to create Provider Network v

Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

+1 Edgar From: netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Salvatore Orlando Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 2:25 AM To: openst...@lists.launchpad.net Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Netstack]

[Netstack] api extensions question

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Robert Kukura wrote: > On 06/10/2012 03:19 PM, Irena Berezovsky wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > May I add to your question also considerations regarding network > creation - POST operation? > > I may be wrong in my understanding, but it seems to me that in case of > Req

Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: > Hi, > > During our last project meeting there was some interest in introducing > "review days" for Quantum core devs. > I see multiple benefits in this approach: > > 1) Contributors would know which core member the need to contact on a >

Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

As the link to the wiki page is now buried deep in this thread, here it is again: http://wiki.openstack.org/Quantum/ReviewDays Weekend days have been added on GaryK's request! Salvatore On 11 June 2012 16:51, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Salvatore Orlando > wrot

Re: [Netstack] [Quantum] Review days for Quantum core devs

I took Mondays! Edgar From: netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+eperdomo=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Salvatore Orlando Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 10:06 AM To: Dan Wendlandt Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net; openst...@lists.launch

Re: [Netstack] About API v2.0 return value by list_xx

The problem with page/pagesize parameters for the API is that retrieving all entities in a non-lossy way requires state storage on the server (which is not allowed in REST). I understand the cursor/limit approach is harder for the UI, but these clients already need to handle problems of sorting, a

Re: [Netstack] api extensions question

On 06/11/2012 11:28 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Robert Kukura > wrote: > > On 06/10/2012 03:19 PM, Irena Berezovsky wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > May I add to your question also considerations regarding network > creatio

Re: [Netstack] About API v2.0 return value by list_xx

Right. We had a huge discussion on pagination on the OpenStack mailing list back in the day. Most clients simply want to iterate through the collection and as Peter stated using a marker allows you to do this in a non-lossy way. Some of our customers (Rightscale, I think), complained a lot abo