Re: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit plans

Dan, I think the distinction between ‘shiny’ and ‘community’ is just fantastic! I would like to join Dan in stressing the important of the ‘community’ list, adding that most of the things in the list below are probably “conditio sine qua non” for getting into core. During the Folsom release cyc

[Netstack] Interaction between nova and melange : ip fixed not found

Hi all, I use the trunk version of Nova, Quantum (with the OVS plugin) and Melange. I created networks, everything seems to be right. I have two questions : - the first VM I boot takes always a wrong IP address (for instance 172.16.0.0). However, when I boot a second VM, this one takes a good IP

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] Interaction between nova and melange : ip fixed not found

Hi Jason, Thank you very much for your answer. The problem about the wrong ip address is solved now! Perhaps this octect should be excluded automatically by nova at the network creation time? Regarding the other problem about nova/melange, in fact, I creates all my networks with the nova-manage c

Re: [Netstack] Fwd: [Openstack] Interaction between nova and melange : ip fixed not found

Hi Anne, I had similar questions... The only resource I found is the python-malangeclient code, which effectively provides a cli tool to exercise the API. [1] describes the entities to operate on ( the first argument) - each class is a possible entity, with the second argument to the cli being

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] Interaction between nova and melange : ip fixed not found

2012/2/29 Dan Wendlandt : > > > 2012/2/29 Jérôme Gallard >> >> Hi Jason, >> >> Thank you very much for your answer. >> The problem about the wrong ip address is solved now! Perhaps this >> octect should be excluded automatically by nova at the network >> creation time? > > > I agree that it seems

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] Interaction between nova and melange : ip fixed not found

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Troy Toman wrote: > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > > 2012/2/29 Jérôme Gallard >> >> Hi Jason, >> >> Thank you very much for your answer. >> The problem about the wrong ip address is solved now! Perhaps this >> octect should be excluded

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] PyCon 2012 Sprints update

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat) wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for taking the lead on this. I was curious to know as to what the > agenda is on the following sprint topic: > "defining a first draft of an API for layer 3 networking support" > > Is this discussion in the

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] Help on Quantum installation through DevStack (openvswitch error) !!

Hi Hitesh, > Setting up openvswitch-switch (1.2.0-1ubuntu3) ... > FATAL: Module openvswitch_mod not found. > * Inserting openvswitch module > * not removing bridge module because bridges exist (br100 virbr0) I interpret this as that the attempt to remove (Linux) "bridge" kernel module was made,

[Netstack] bug 948467 - agent root_helper

I intend to submit a patch today for RC1 so that the linuxbridge and openvswitch agents will no longer need to run as root. Instead, they will read a root_helper config variable and prepend that to the commands they execute, as nova does when it executes commands for which run_as_root is specified

Re: [Netstack] bug 948467 - agent root_helper

Hi Bob, Thanks for taking this up. Responses inline. ~Sumit. > -Original Message- > From: Robert Kukura [mailto:rkuk...@redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 9:40 AM > To: Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat); Dan Wendlandt; Brad Hall; > netstack@lists.launchpad.net > Cc: Christopher Wright >

Re: [Netstack] bug 948467 - agent root_helper

Hi Bob, I think this email highlights a general issue around need a general library of common code for agents, since many of them will benefit from things like root-wrap, common logging code, etc. This is something I'd like to push for in Folsom (particularly in the scope of openstack-common), so

[Netstack] Fwd: [Openstack] Meetings time warning !

meeting time changes today! see you all one our later for those of you in the US. -- Forwarded message -- From: Thierry Carrez Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:34 AM Subject: [Openstack] Meetings time warning ! To: "openst...@lists.launchpad.net" Hi everyone, The US moved to DST

Re: [Netstack] bug 948467 - agent root_helper

On 03/13/2012 01:38 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > Hi Bob, > > I think this email highlights a general issue around need a general > library of common code for agents, since many of them will benefit from > things like root-wrap, common logging code, etc. This is something I'd > like to push for in F

Re: [Netstack] bug 948467 - agent root_helper

moving mark and jay to BCC, as I added them mainly for the comments about openstack-common. On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Robert Kukura wrote: > > > > > > My only concerns here are really around trying to adding the rootwrap > > capability right before we release our RC (target is tomorrow, >

Re: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit plans

Hi Dan, I completely agree with Salvatore comments on (Quantum has an awful lot of potential, but to put in Dell’s Rob Hirschfeld words: “potential means you’ve got to keep working on it.” (see his post on Quantum: http://robhirschfeld.com/2012/02/08/quantum-network-virtualization-in-the-openstack

Re: [Netstack] bug 948467 - agent root_helper

On 03/13/2012 02:17 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > moving mark and jay to BCC, as I added them mainly for the comments > about openstack-common. > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Robert Kukura > wrote: > > > > > > My only concerns here are really around tryin

Re: [Netstack] bug 948467 - agent root_helper

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Robert Kukura wrote: > On 03/13/2012 02:17 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > moving mark and jay to BCC, as I added them mainly for the comments > > about openstack-common. > > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Robert Kukura > > wrote:

Re: [Netstack] quantum community projects & folsom summit plans

On Mar 13, 2012, at 2:19 PM, hitesh wadekar wrote: > Along this I would like to explore OVS and feature enhancement for it in > Quantum-plug in and agent. While installing Quantum using DevStack I have > been encountering with OVS packaging issue for Ubuntu oneiric and this is the > existing

Re: [Netstack] Opensack + Devstack Tutorial

Thanks David. It is a really great presentation. I am sure it will be helpful for new comer in Quantum Appreciate it. Now I got the complete overview of how Quantum single and multi-node node devstack works. Also, It is easy to drill down each component to study and understand. Thanks David. On

Re: [Netstack] Opensack + Devstack Tutorial

On Mar 13, 2012, at 2:55 PM, hitesh wadekar wrote: > Thanks David. > > It is a really great presentation. I am sure it will be helpful for new comer > in Quantum > > Appreciate it. Now I got the complete overview of how Quantum single and > multi-node node devstack works. Also, It is easy to d

Re: [Netstack] [Openstack] Help on Quantum installation through DevStack (openvswitch error) !!

Hi Piyanai, Thank you very much for the overview of the OVS. It is really helpful to understand the working of OVS and its kernel module. I was looking for it. Yes you are right it is an already existence bridge (Linux bridge) problems that OVS tried to removed it, but it failed. However, to ove

Re: [Netstack] bug 948467 - agent root_helper

On 03/13/2012 02:33 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Robert Kukura > wrote: > > On 03/13/2012 02:17 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: [...] > > > > At this point, perhaps an RFC patch would be best, so we can discuss > > concrete

[Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

Hi folks, We've been lucky to have a good number of new people contributing to Quantum in the past few months, and so I wanted to start the process of growing the quantum-core developer team. To this end, I nominate the following people for quantum core devs: Bob Kurkura Dave Lapsley Maru Newby

Re: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

+1 From: netstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Dan Wendlandt Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 3:42 PM To: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs Hi folks,

Re: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

+1 for Bob Kurkura +1 for Dave Lapsley +1 for Maru Newby From: netstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Debo Dutta (dedutta) Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:02 PM To: Dan Wendlandt; netstack@lists.laun

[Netstack] RC1 reviews

Ok folks, we need some review love from the existing core dev team. RC1 date is tomorrow, and it would be a shame to let the work people have done her miss :) While you're at it, please reply to the ML thread voting on new core devs, so the review load can be spread across more people in the futu

Re: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

+1 for all! From: netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Debo Dutta (dedutta) Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 4:09 PM To: Debo Dutta (dedutta); Dan Wendlandt; netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [

Re: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

Thanks a lot Bob, Maru and Dave +1 for all Ram On Mar 13, 2012, at 19:57, "Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat)" wrote: > +1 for all! > > From: netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:netstack-bounces+snaiksat=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of > Debo Dutta (ded

Re: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

It's my pleasure to work with you all. +1 for all, Thanks, Hitesh Wadekar On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Ram Durairaj (radurair) wrote: > Thanks a lot Bob, Maru and Dave > > +1 for all > > Ram > > > On Mar 13, 2012, at 19:57, "Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat)" < > snaik...@cisco.com> wrote: > > +1

Re: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

+1 for all three of them from me too On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:44 PM, hitesh wadekar wrote: > It's my pleasure to work with you all. > > +1 for all, > > Thanks, > Hitesh Wadekar > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Ram Durairaj (radurair) < > radur...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Thanks a lot Bob, Ma

Re: [Netstack] proposal for new quantum-core devs

It has come to my attention that I butchered one of the proposed core candidates names. Its Bob Kukura, not Kurkura My apologies :) Dan On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Dan Wendlandt wrote: > Hi folks, > > We've been lucky to have a good number of new people contributing to > Quantum in the