Re: [Netstack] Changing the update_{network,port} calls

2011-10-27 Thread Brad Hall
unces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:netstack-bounces+salvatore.orlando=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net] > On Behalf Of Dan Wendlandt > Sent: 19 October 2011 01:01 > To: Brad Hall > Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net > Subject: Re: [Netstack] Changing the upd

Re: [Netstack] Changing the update_{network,port} calls

2011-10-19 Thread Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat)
Hi Brad, Thanks for starting this discussion. A quick note in the context of the reference to the Cisco plugin in your email (and don't mean to distract from the broader theme of the discussion), the changes will have to be made in multiple interfaces & modules (since there is a hierarchy), not ju

Re: [Netstack] Changing the update_{network,port} calls

2011-10-19 Thread Salvatore Orlando
2011 01:01 To: Brad Hall Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Netstack] Changing the update_{network,port} calls On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Brad Hall mailto:b...@nicira.com>> wrote: Hey Everyone, Since the change to make the create() calls take a parameter of k/v pairs has

Re: [Netstack] Changing the update_{network,port} calls

2011-10-18 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Brad Hall wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > Since the change to make the create() calls take a parameter of k/v > pairs has gotten approval I wanted to propose a change to make the > update calls do the same. The review is here: > https://review.openstack.org/#change,92