[Netstack] Reviews

2012-06-24 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, From https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/quantum,n,z 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/8736/ - commit message needs to be updated to include hyperlink to bug id 2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/8556/ - Xen related. I do not feel like I have the know how to c

Re: [Netstack] Reviews

2012-06-17 Thread Sumit Naiksatam (snaiksat)
7:42 AM To: Subject: [Netstack] Reviews Hi, Can people please take a look at the following: Critical: 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/8645/ - linux bridge agent does not work Stable Essex Cherry Picks: 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/8646/ - Quantum Manager disassociate floating-ips o

[Netstack] Reviews

2012-06-17 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Can people please take a look at the following: Critical: 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/8645/ - linux bridge agent does not work Stable Essex Cherry Picks: 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/8646/ - Quantum Manager disassociate floating-ips on instance delete 2. https://review.openst

[Netstack] Reviews

2012-05-09 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, First and foremost I think that it was great chatting about the reviews last night. A few days ago Maru opened a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/995283. This was addressed in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=man-support (it was based on the nova support).

[Netstack] reviews for essex-1

2011-11-05 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Hi folks, Branching for Essex-1 is just a few days away (brach will likely happen tuesday night, with release on thursday). Here is the full set of items being targeted for essex-1: https://launchpad.net/quantum/+milestone/essex-1 Here are the set of quantum reviews for essex-1: https://review.o

Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps

2011-07-31 Thread Salvatore Orlando
mar M; netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps I agree with removing portcount tests until we agree on the specification, I have some comments that I'll try to send out next week regarding the API spec alignment. I would say, after this alignment, we sho

Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps

2011-07-31 Thread Somik Behera
; receive your feedback. > > ** ** > > Cheers, > > Salvatore > > ** ** > > *From:* Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] > *Sent:* 30 July 2011 04:04 > *To:* Somik Behera > *Cc:* Salvatore Orlando; Santhosh Kumar M; netstack@lists.launchpad.net >

Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps

2011-07-30 Thread Salvatore Orlando
sistent with the Openstack API, and I would be more than happy to receive your feedback. Cheers, Salvatore From: Dan Wendlandt [mailto:d...@nicira.com] Sent: 30 July 2011 04:04 To: Somik Behera Cc: Salvatore Orlando; Santhosh Kumar M; netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Netstack] reviews,

Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps

2011-07-29 Thread Dan Wendlandt
ounces+salvatore.orlando= >> eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net] *On Behalf Of *Dan Wendlandt >> *Sent:* 29 July 2011 15:43 >> *To:* Santhosh Kumar M >> *Cc:* netstack@lists.launchpad.net >> *Subject:* Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps >> >>

Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps

2011-07-29 Thread Somik Behera
@lists.launchpad.net] *On Behalf Of *Dan Wendlandt > *Sent:* 29 July 2011 15:43 > *To:* Santhosh Kumar M > *Cc:* netstack@lists.launchpad.net > *Subject:* Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps > > ** ** > > Thanks for pointing that out Santhosh. To avoid confu

Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps

2011-07-29 Thread Salvatore Orlando
t: 29 July 2011 15:43 To: Santhosh Kumar M Cc: netstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps Thanks for pointing that out Santhosh. To avoid confusion, I updated the status of the old merge request from "work in progress" to "rejected&qu

Re: [Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps

2011-07-29 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Thanks for pointing that out Santhosh. To avoid confusion, I updated the status of the old merge request from "work in progress" to "rejected" to indicate that it is no longer expected to be merged (this should keep the history around, as I did not delete the merge request). The new merge request

[Netstack] reviews, merges, and next steps

2011-07-28 Thread Dan Wendlandt
Ok, so we're trying to clear a bunch of small bugs out the the pipeline, should be easy reviews: - https://code.launchpad.net/~tylesmit/quantum/quantum-bug-814517/+merge/69477 - https://code.launchpad.net/~danwent/quantum/bug814012/+merge/69505 - https://code.launchpad.net/~danwent/quantum/bug8178