Re: tiacx - don't use UTS_RELEASE

2006-07-04 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:51 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 02:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:07:59 +0200 > > > Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > patch belo

Re: tiacx - don't use UTS_RELEASE

2006-07-04 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 02:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:07:59 +0200 > > Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > patch below removes the use of UTS_RELEASE from the tiacx driver; there > > >

Re: tiacx - don't use UTS_RELEASE

2006-07-04 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 02:25 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:07:59 +0200 > Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > patch below removes the use of UTS_RELEASE from the tiacx driver; there > > is absolutely no reason for a driver to print the kernel version or use > > t

Re: tiacx - don't use UTS_RELEASE

2006-07-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 11:07:59 +0200 Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > patch below removes the use of UTS_RELEASE from the tiacx driver; there > is absolutely no reason for a driver to print the kernel version or use > the UTS_RELEASE field; in addition this field changes all the time so

tiacx - don't use UTS_RELEASE

2006-07-04 Thread Arjan van de Ven
Hi, patch below removes the use of UTS_RELEASE from the tiacx driver; there is absolutely no reason for a driver to print the kernel version or use the UTS_RELEASE field; in addition this field changes all the time so this causes spurious rebuilds.. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECT