On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 15:46:31 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
>This makes me believe that Ingo's patch (which I see is now in Linus' and
>Andrew's trees) is the way to go and not the lock re-order approach in Adam's
>patch. I'm going to continue to look into this, almost more for my own
>education than
On Tuesday, January 2 2007 6:37 pm, David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:25:24 -0500
>
> > I'm sorry I just saw this mail (mail not sent directly to me get
> > shuffled off to a folder). I agree with your patch, I think
> > dropping and then re-taki
From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 16:25:24 -0500
> I'm sorry I just saw this mail (mail not sent directly to me get
> shuffled off to a folder). I agree with your patch, I think
> dropping and then re-taking the RCU lock is the best way to go,
> although I'm curious to se
On Tuesday, January 2 2007 2:58 am, Adam J. Richter wrote:
> I have not yet performed the 21 steps of
> linux-2.6.20-rc3/Documentation/SubmitChecklist, which I think is a
> great objectives list for future automation or some kind of community
> web site. I hope to find time to make progress
On Sunday, December 24 2006 7:25 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:24 +0800
>
> "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Under 2.6.20-rc1 and 2.6.20-rc2, I get the following complaint
> > for several network programs running on my system:
> >
> > [ 156.381868] BUG: s
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 04:25:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:24 +0800
> "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Under 2.6.20-rc1 and 2.6.20-rc2, I get the following complaint
>> for several network programs running on my system:
>>
>> [ 156.381868] BU
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, Dec 24, 2006 7:25 pm
Subject: Re: selinux networking: sleeping functin called from invalid context
in 2.6.20-rc[12]
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:24 +0800
>"Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 05:21:24 +0800
"Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under 2.6.20-rc1 and 2.6.20-rc2, I get the following complaint
> for several network programs running on my system:
>
> [ 156.381868] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> net/core/sock.c:1
