18.09.2015 20:30, Florian Fainelli пишет:
On 18/09/15 10:22, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 07:04:09PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
18.09.2015 18:43, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:45:27PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
AFAICS if it has use_inban
On 18/09/15 10:22, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 07:04:09PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 18.09.2015 18:43, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:45:27PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
AFAICS if it has use_inband_status==true,
then it went
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 07:04:09PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 18.09.2015 18:43, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:45:27PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >> AFAICS if it has use_inband_status==true,
> >> then it went through of_phy_register_fixed_link(dn),
> >
> > That'
18.09.2015 18:43, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:45:27PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 18.09.2015 16:57, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:43:59PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
18.09.2015 16:12, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> On Fr
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 05:45:27PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 18.09.2015 16:57, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:43:59PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >> 18.09.2015 16:12, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:43:54PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wro
18.09.2015 16:57, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:43:59PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 18.09.2015 16:12, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:43:54PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
18.09.2015 15:13, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> On Fr
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:43:59PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 18.09.2015 16:12, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:43:54PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >> 18.09.2015 15:13, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:29:34PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wro
18.09.2015 16:12, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:43:54PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 18.09.2015 15:13, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:29:34PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
18.09.2015 02:14, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> _But
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 03:43:54PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 18.09.2015 15:13, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:29:34PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> >> 18.09.2015 02:14, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> >>> _But_ using the in-band status
> >>>property fundamen
18.09.2015 15:13, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:29:34PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
>> 18.09.2015 02:14, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
>>> _But_ using the in-band status
>>>property fundamentally requires this for mvneta to behave correctly:
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:29:34PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 18.09.2015 02:14, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> > _But_ using the in-band status
> >property fundamentally requires this for mvneta to behave correctly:
> >
> > phy-mode = "sgmii";
> > managed = "in-ba
18.09.2015 02:14, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> 3. Having DT specify a fixed-link with parameters along with in-band
>negotiation results in the fixed-link parameters being ignored.
>This means if a fixed-link DT declaration specifies a speed, that
>declaration will be ignored. Wha
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 04:36:44PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 17/09/15 16:14, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >with _no_ phy node.
> >
> > 4. Going back to the SFP problem, the link is only up when the SFP
> >module pins indicate that there's no transmitter fault,
On 17/09/15 16:14, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[snip]
>with _no_ phy node.
>
> 4. Going back to the SFP problem, the link is only up when the SFP
>module pins indicate that there's no transmitter fault, no loss of
>signal _and_ the PCS layer at the MAC indicates that it has compl
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:02:41 -0700
> On 17/09/15 15:12, David Miller wrote:
>> I can queue up the whole series for -stable if you want.
>
> I think this would be a good thing, mvneta-based platforms are fairly
> popular.
Done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:12:47PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:42:09 +0100
>
> > Thanks, I think that will solve it. I have to wonder why that patch
> > (f8af8e6eb9509 in mainline) didn't made it into v4.2 though, as it's
> > billed as
On 17/09/15 15:12, David Miller wrote:
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:42:09 +0100
>
>> Thanks, I think that will solve it. I have to wonder why that patch
>> (f8af8e6eb9509 in mainline) didn't made it into v4.2 though, as it's
>> billed as a regression that occurred
From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:42:09 +0100
> Thanks, I think that will solve it. I have to wonder why that patch
> (f8af8e6eb9509 in mainline) didn't made it into v4.2 though, as it's
> billed as a regression that occurred in the previous merge window, and
> given that
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 02:06:13PM +0300, Stas Sergeev wrote:
> 14.09.2015 13:32, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
> >I've been bringing up the mainline kernel on a new board, which has
> >an Marvell SoC with a mvneta interface connected to a Marvell DSA
> >switch. The DSA switch is a 88E6176.
> >
14.09.2015 13:32, Russell King - ARM Linux пишет:
I've been bringing up the mainline kernel on a new board, which has
an Marvell SoC with a mvneta interface connected to a Marvell DSA
switch. The DSA switch is a 88E6176.
In the DT block for the interface, I specify:
ethernet@... {
I've been bringing up the mainline kernel on a new board, which has
an Marvell SoC with a mvneta interface connected to a Marvell DSA
switch. The DSA switch is a 88E6176.
In the DT block for the interface, I specify:
ethernet@... {
phy-mode = "sgmii";
stat
21 matches
Mail list logo
