Re: circular locking, mirred, 2.6.24.2

2008-02-25 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:48:38PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > What does it mean early? > I have custom boot scripts, it is also custom system based on busybox. There > is a chance that i forgot to bring ifb0 up, but thats it. > I think such warning must not appear on any actions in users

Re: circular locking, mirred, 2.6.24.2

2008-02-25 Thread Denys Fedoryshchenko
What does it mean early? I have custom boot scripts, it is also custom system based on busybox. There is a chance that i forgot to bring ifb0 up, but thats it. I think such warning must not appear on any actions in userspace. On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:56:46 +, Jarek Poplawski wrote > On 24-02-20

Re: circular locking, mirred, 2.6.24.2

2008-02-25 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On 24-02-2008 23:20, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > 2.6.24.2 with applied patches for printk,softlockup, and patch for htb (as i > understand, they are in 2.6.25 git and it is fixes). > > I will send also to private mails QoS rules i am using. > > [ 118.840072] ==

circular locking, mirred, 2.6.24.2

2008-02-24 Thread Denys Fedoryshchenko
2.6.24.2 with applied patches for printk,softlockup, and patch for htb (as i understand, they are in 2.6.25 git and it is fixes). I will send also to private mails QoS rules i am using. [ 118.840072] === [ 118.840158] [ INFO: possible circula