What does it mean early?
I have custom boot scripts, it is also custom system based on busybox. There
is a chance that i forgot to bring ifb0 up, but thats it.
I think such warning must not appear on any actions in userspace.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:56:46 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote
> On 24-02-2008 23:20, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > 2.6.24.2 with applied patches for printk,softlockup, and patch for htb
(as i
> > understand, they are in 2.6.25 git and it is fixes).
> >
> > I will send also to private mails QoS rules i am using.
> >
> > [ 118.840072] =======================================================
> > [ 118.840158] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > [ 118.840203] 2.6.24.2-build-0022 #7
> > [ 118.840243] -------------------------------------------------------
> > [ 118.840288] swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
> > [ 118.840329] (&dev->queue_lock){-+..}, at: [<c0289c11>] dev_queue_xmit
> > +0x177/0x302
> > [ 118.840490]
> > [ 118.840490] but task is already holding lock:
> > [ 118.840567] (&p->tcfc_lock){-+..}, at: [<f89f0066>] tcf_mirred
+0x20/0x180
> > [act_mirred]
> > [ 118.840727]
> > [ 118.840727] which lock already depends on the new lock.
> > [ 118.840728]
> > [ 118.840842]
> > [ 118.840842] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
> > [ 118.840921]
> > [ 118.840921] -> #2 (&p->tcfc_lock){-+..}:
> > [ 118.841075] [<c0143624>] __lock_acquire+0xa30/0xc19
> > [ 118.841324] [<c0143887>] lock_acquire+0x7a/0x94
> > [ 118.841572] [<c02d93f5>] _spin_lock+0x2e/0x58
> > [ 118.841820] [<f89f0066>] tcf_mirred+0x20/0x180 [act_mirred]
> > [ 118.842068] [<c0297ec4>] tcf_action_exec+0x44/0x77
> > [ 118.842344] [<f89ba5d2>] u32_classify+0x119/0x24a [cls_u32]
> > [ 118.842595] [<c0295ce2>] tc_classify_compat+0x2f/0x5e
> > [ 118.842845] [<c0295ec3>] tc_classify+0x1a/0x80
> > [ 118.843092] [<f899c118>] ingress_enqueue+0x1a/0x53 [sch_ingress]
> > [ 118.843343] [<c0287139>] netif_receive_skb+0x296/0x44c
> > [ 118.843592] [<f88d1a4e>] e100_poll+0x14b/0x26a [e100]
> > [ 118.843843] [<c02894bc>] net_rx_action+0xbf/0x201
> > [ 118.844091] [<c012ac15>] __do_softirq+0x6f/0xe9
> > [ 118.844343] [<c01078af>] do_softirq+0x61/0xc8
> > [ 118.844591] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> > [ 118.844840]
> > [ 118.844840] -> #1 (&dev->ingress_lock){-+..}:
> > [ 118.844993] [<c0143624>] __lock_acquire+0xa30/0xc19
> > [ 118.845242] [<c0143887>] lock_acquire+0x7a/0x94
> > [ 118.845489] [<c02d93f5>] _spin_lock+0x2e/0x58
> > [ 118.845737] [<c0295387>] qdisc_lock_tree+0x1e/0x21
> > [ 118.845984] [<c02953b6>] dev_init_scheduler+0xb/0x53
> > [ 118.846235] [<c0288483>] register_netdevice+0x2a3/0x2fd
> > [ 118.846483] [<c028850f>] register_netdev+0x32/0x3f
> > [ 118.846730] [<c03ea8ee>] loopback_net_init+0x39/0x6c
> > [ 118.846980] [<c02858ef>] register_pernet_operations+0x13/0x15
> > [ 118.847230] [<c0285958>] register_pernet_device+0x1f/0x4c
> > [ 118.847478] [<c03ea8b3>] loopback_init+0xd/0xf
> > [ 118.847725] [<c03d64df>] kernel_init+0x155/0x2c6
>
> This looks strange: are you sure your tc scripts aren't started too
> early? (Or maybe there are some problems during booting?)
>
> Regards,
> Jarek P.
>
> > [ 118.847973] [<c0105bab>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> > [ 118.848225] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> > [ 118.848472]
> > [ 118.848472] -> #0 (&dev->queue_lock){-+..}:
> > [ 118.848626] [<c0143514>] __lock_acquire+0x920/0xc19
> > [ 118.848874] [<c0143887>] lock_acquire+0x7a/0x94
> > [ 118.849122] [<c02d93f5>] _spin_lock+0x2e/0x58
> > [ 118.849370] [<c0289c11>] dev_queue_xmit+0x177/0x302
> > [ 118.849617] [<f89f01a5>] tcf_mirred+0x15f/0x180 [act_mirred]
> > [ 118.849866] [<c0297ec4>] tcf_action_exec+0x44/0x77
> > [ 118.850114] [<f89ba5d2>] u32_classify+0x119/0x24a [cls_u32]
> > [ 118.850366] [<c0295ce2>] tc_classify_compat+0x2f/0x5e
> > [ 118.850614] [<c0295ec3>] tc_classify+0x1a/0x80
> > [ 118.850861] [<f899c118>] ingress_enqueue+0x1a/0x53 [sch_ingress]
> > [ 118.851111] [<c0287139>] netif_receive_skb+0x296/0x44c
> > [ 118.851360] [<f88d1a4e>] e100_poll+0x14b/0x26a [e100]
> > [ 118.851612] [<c02894bc>] net_rx_action+0xbf/0x201
> > [ 118.851859] [<c012ac15>] __do_softirq+0x6f/0xe9
> > [ 118.852106] [<c01078af>] do_softirq+0x61/0xc8
> > [ 118.852355] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> ....
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
