On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:00:10PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> There is another bug I see there in the cleanup path too.
> We don't unregister the inet6 protosw on the failure path.
> But this appears totally harmless since you can't reference
> the inet6 proto switch table once you unload the
From: Olaf Kirch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:03:19 +0100
> The patch below fixes a minor issue with inet6_init.
> I noticed though that the code explicitly ignores
> the error code of sock_register by calling:
> (void) sock_register(&inet6_family_ops);
> Why does it do this
The patch below fixes a minor issue with inet6_init.
I noticed though that the code explicitly ignores
the error code of sock_register by calling:
(void) sock_register(&inet6_family_ops);
Why does it do this?
Olaf
--
Subject:
