On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:33:19PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> > > > > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is
> > > > > > sufficient. I don't remember it ever been really discussed for
>
> > > > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > > > >
> > > > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is
> > > > > sufficient. I don't remember it ever been really discussed for
> > > > > DSA. It was a Melanox discussion about limiting pause for the
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:19:19PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> > > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > > >
> > > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I
> > > > don't remember it ever been really discussed for DSA. It was a
> >
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 04:19:19PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> > > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > > >
> > > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I
> > > > don't remember it ever been really discussed for DSA. It was a
> >
> > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > >
> > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I
> > > don't remember it ever been really discussed for DSA. It was a
> > > Melanox discussion about limiting pause for the CPU. So I think it
>
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:12:14AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> > >
> > > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I
> > > don't remember it ever been really discussed for DSA
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:19:50PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:12:14AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> > I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
> >
> > DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is
> > Hi,
> >
> > Armada has options for 1G/10G ports without PHY's(for example
> community board Macchiato single shot).
> > This port doesn't have PHY's and cannot negotiate Flow Control support,
> but we can for example connect two ports without PHY's and manually(by
> ethtool) configure FC.
>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:12:14AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> I discussed it with Andrew earlier last year, and his response was:
>
> DT configuration of pause for fixed link probably is sufficient. I don't
> remember it ever been really discussed for DSA. It was a Melanox
>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:51:46AM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Armada has options for 1G/10G ports without PHY's(for example
> > community board Macchiato single shot).
> > > This port doesn't have PHY's and cannot negotiate Flow Control support,
> > but we can for example
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 10:12:25AM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Armada has options for 1G/10G ports without PHY's(for example community board
> Macchiato single shot).
> This port doesn't have PHY's and cannot negotiate Flow Control support, but
> we can for example connect two ports w
Hi,
Armada has options for 1G/10G ports without PHY's(for example community board
Macchiato single shot).
This port doesn't have PHY's and cannot negotiate Flow Control support, but we
can for example connect two ports without PHY's and manually(by ethtool)
configure FC.
Current phylink return
12 matches
Mail list logo
