Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-20 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Monday 15 May 2006 06:27, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > On Sunday 14 May 2006 08:57, Ayaz Abdulla wrote: > > Alistair John Strachan wrote: > > [snip] > > > > There's been just a single commit since -rc3: > > > > > > forcedeth: fix multi irq issues > > > ebf34c9b6fcd22338ef764b039b3ac55ed0e297b

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-14 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 14 May 2006 08:57, Ayaz Abdulla wrote: > Alistair John Strachan wrote: [snip] > > There's been just a single commit since -rc3: > > > > forcedeth: fix multi irq issues > > ebf34c9b6fcd22338ef764b039b3ac55ed0e297b > > > > However, it could have just been hidden since before -rc3, so I'll t

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-14 Thread Ayaz Abdulla
Alistair John Strachan wrote: On Friday 12 May 2006 00:44, Linus Torvalds wrote: Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again, but -rc4 is out there, and this is the time to hunker down for 2.6.17. If you know of any regressions, please holler now, so that we don't

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-12 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Friday 12 May 2006 00:44, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again, > but -rc4 is out there, and this is the time to hunker down for 2.6.17. > > If you know of any regressions, please holler now, so that we don't miss > them. > > -rc4 itself

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-12 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 12 May 2006 13:23, you wrote: > > > I got assertion failures in the bcm43xx driver: > > > > > > bcm43xx: Chip ID 0x4318, rev 0x2 > > > > That is expected an non-fatal. > > Is this one in the same category? > [ 79.087115] bcm43xx: WARNING: Writing invalid LOpair (low: 46, high: 104,

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-12 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 12 May 2006 13:47, you wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:44:22PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Friday 12 May 2006 12:24, you wrote: > > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again,

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-12 Thread Erik Mouw
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:44:22PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Friday 12 May 2006 12:24, you wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again, > > > but -rc4 is out there, and this is the t

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-12 Thread Olaf Hering
On Fri, May 12, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Friday 12 May 2006 12:24, you wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again, > > > but -rc4 is out there, and this is the time to hunker down for 2

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-12 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 12 May 2006 12:24, you wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again, > > but -rc4 is out there, and this is the time to hunker down for 2.6.17. > > > > If you know of any regressions,

Re: Linux v2.6.17-rc4

2006-05-12 Thread Erik Mouw
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again, > but -rc4 is out there, and this is the time to hunker down for 2.6.17. > > If you know of any regressions, please holler now, so that we don't miss > them.