On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 12:44:22PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Friday 12 May 2006 12:24, you wrote: > > On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:44:03PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Ok, I've let the release time between -rc's slide a bit too much again, > > > but -rc4 is out there, and this is the time to hunker down for 2.6.17. > > > > > > If you know of any regressions, please holler now, so that we don't miss > > > them. > > > > I got assertion failures in the bcm43xx driver: > > > > bcm43xx: Chip ID 0x4318, rev 0x2 > > That is expected an non-fatal.
Assertion failed sounds rather fatal to me. > It is no regression. It is, I didn't see it in 2.6.17-rc3. > We are working on it, but there won't be any fix for 2.6.17, as > very intrusive changes are needed to fix this. If it's non-fatal, could you remove the assertion, or make it print something that sounds less fatal? Erik -- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
