On Monday 06 February 2006 15:59, Jiri Benc wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] d80211: rename ieee80211_rx to __ieee80211_rx
>
> This patch fix the problem reported by Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> net/ieee80211/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
> : multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx'
>
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:36:26 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Maybe people always compile the stacks as modules, so this does
> only appear on insmod time... .
That's my case. I've also never inserted both modules together.
> But how to solve it? I suggest to change all dscape function prefixes
> fr
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 02:55:43PM -0800, shemminger wrote:
> But then the module autoloader is going to work correctly, and what
> about people using drivers that use conflicting stacks? Get the
> namespace issues sorted out before you consider getting it into the
> mainline.
I thought that only
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 06:01:45PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Avoiding namespace clashes means that you avoid confusing all manner of
> common developer tools. In particular, 'make allyesconfig' is a
> valuable developer tool that should not be broken.
I agree with this completely; I just wou
Jouni Malinen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:36:26PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
net/ieee80211/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
: multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx'
net/d80211/built-in.o:: first defined here
But how to solve it? I suggest to change all dscape function prefixe
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 13:56 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:36:26PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> > net/ieee80211/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
> > : multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx'
> > net/d80211/built-in.o:: first defined here
>
> > But how to solve i
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:36:26PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> net/ieee80211/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
> : multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx'
> net/d80211/built-in.o:: first defined here
> But how to solve it? I suggest to change all dscape function prefixes
> from ieee80211_F
On Thursday 02 February 2006 21:04, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:36:26PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > Not sure, if I am the first one compiling the domesday branch,
> > but the ieee80211_rx symbol clashes:
> >
> > net/ieee80211/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
>
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:36:26PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Not sure, if I am the first one compiling the domesday branch,
> but the ieee80211_rx symbol clashes:
>
> net/ieee80211/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
> : multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx'
> net/d80211/built-in.o:: firs
Not sure, if I am the first one compiling the domesday branch,
but the ieee80211_rx symbol clashes:
net/ieee80211/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx':
: multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx'
net/d80211/built-in.o:: first defined here
Maybe people always compile the stacks as modules, so this d
10 matches
Mail list logo
