On Thursday 02 February 2006 21:04, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 08:36:26PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Not sure, if I am the first one compiling the domesday branch, > > but the ieee80211_rx symbol clashes: > > > > net/ieee80211/built-in.o: In function `ieee80211_rx': > > : multiple definition of `ieee80211_rx' > > net/d80211/built-in.o:: first defined here > > > > Maybe people always compile the stacks as modules, so this does > > only appear on insmod time... . > > It shows-up w/ allyesconfig.
Yes. > Are you saying it shows-up w/ modules > as well? No. > Soon we will have to pick on stack or the other to pursue. > (We probably already should have done it...) Well, I really think we can't stay with either stack. We must begin to merge both stacks to get a usable one. And we need to rewrite the userspace ABI. (as discussed in other threads). But I would suggest to wait until the Wireless Summit at OSDL is done. It is still two months from now, but I hope it is worth waiting for it. Or do you think we should start merging frunctionatity _now_, to get more practical experience for the summit? Anyway. In my opinion best will be to: Stay with current in-kernel code and begin to merge functionality from dscape. I think the ieee80211 API has to be cleaned up, too. There is too much private stuff in the public structures. d80211 is better at this point. -- Greetings Michael.
pgppTZ4IaHFkM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
