Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Subject: e1000: omit stats for broken counter in 82543
From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The 82543 chip does not count tx_carrier_errors properly in FD mode;
report zeros instead of garbage.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Auke
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Needs to use an "i have broken stats" feature flag, rather than adding
yet another mac_type test into the code. This testing of MAC type
rather than feature flags is a major e1000 problem, and it bloats the
driver quite a bit. Intel has been told fo
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Needs to use an "i have broken stats" feature flag, rather than adding
yet another mac_type test into the code. This testing of MAC type
rather than feature flags is a major e1000 problem, and it bloats the
driver quite a bit. Intel has been told for /months/ this is a prob
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Subject: e1000: omit stats for broken counter in 82543
From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The 82543 chip does not count tx_carrier_errors properly in FD mode;
report zeros instead of garbage.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Auke
Subject: e1000: omit stats for broken counter in 82543
From: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The 82543 chip does not count tx_carrier_errors properly in FD mode;
report zeros instead of garbage.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
