Hello!
> > static void netlink_table_grab(void)
> > {
> > write_lock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
>
> well it could be this one as well...
Indeed.
But it still looks as something very strange.
There are some GFP_KERNEL allocations on the way to this function.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 20:00 +0400, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > ok, that WARN_ON is over-eager. Fix is below:
>
> Nevertheless, I cannot figure out what's happening here.
>
> This local_bh_disable() is called right after schedule().
> No way irqs can be disabled there. What is wrong?
>
Hello!
> ok, that WARN_ON is over-eager. Fix is below:
Nevertheless, I cannot figure out what's happening here.
This local_bh_disable() is called right after schedule().
No way irqs can be disabled there. What is wrong?
static void netlink_table_grab(void)
{
write_lock_bh(&nl_table_loc
* Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrew Morton napsal(a):
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc5/2.6.17-rc5-mm1/
>
> BUG: warning at /l/latest/xxx/kernel/softirq.c:86/local_bh_disable()
ok, that
