Hi Levi,
On 01/23/2018 05:43 PM, Levi Pearson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
> wrote:
>> This series is the v2 of the Time based packet transmission RFC, which was
>> originally proposed by Richard Cochran: https://lwn.net/Articles/733962/ .
>
> Great to see you
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia
wrote:
> This series is the v2 of the Time based packet transmission RFC, which was
> originally proposed by Richard Cochran: https://lwn.net/Articles/733962/ .
Great to see you carrying on with this!
> Our main questions at this stage are
Hi,
On 01/22/2018 09:26 PM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:23:27PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 03:06:11PM -0800, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote:
>>> First, a baseline test was ran for 10 minutes with the plain kernel only:
>>>
>>> |
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:23:27PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 03:06:11PM -0800, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote:
> > First, a baseline test was ran for 10 minutes with the plain kernel only:
> >
> > | | plain kernel @ 1ms |
> > |-+-
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 03:06:11PM -0800, Jesus Sanchez-Palencia wrote:
> First, a baseline test was ran for 10 minutes with the plain kernel only:
>
> | | plain kernel @ 1ms |
> |-++
> | min (ns): |+4.82e+02 |
> | max (ns):
This series is the v2 of the Time based packet transmission RFC, which was
originally proposed by Richard Cochran: https://lwn.net/Articles/733962/ .
It introduces a new socket option (SO_TXTIME), a new qdisc (tbs) and implements
support for hw offloading on the igb driver for the Intel i210 NIC.
