On 1/3/18 1:53 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:47:16AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 1/3/18 10:40 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>> David, can we please get back to the issue at hand? What's the problem
>>> with the location of the call to rt6_sync_up()?
>>
>> My original comment w
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 11:47:16AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/3/18 10:40 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > David, can we please get back to the issue at hand? What's the problem
> > with the location of the call to rt6_sync_up()?
>
> My original comment was asking why do it on NETDEV_CHANGE when i
On 1/3/18 10:40 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> David, can we please get back to the issue at hand? What's the problem
> with the location of the call to rt6_sync_up()?
My original comment was asking why do it on NETDEV_CHANGE when it should
only be needed on NETDEV_UP.
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 09:56:02AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/3/18 9:43 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 08:32:51AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> >> On 1/3/18 12:44 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> > index ed06b1190f
On 1/3/18 9:43 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 08:32:51AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 1/3/18 12:44 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index ed06b1190f05..b6405568ed7b 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 08:32:51AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 1/3/18 12:44 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> >>> index ed06b1190f05..b6405568ed7b 100644
> >>> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> >>> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> >>> @@ -3484,6 +3484,9
On 1/3/18 12:44 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>>> index ed06b1190f05..b6405568ed7b 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
>>> @@ -3484,6 +3484,9 @@ static int addrconf_notify(struct notifier_block
>>> *this, unsigned
Hi David,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 09:20:47AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 12/31/17 9:14 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > Previous patch marked nexthops with the 'dead' and 'linkdown' flags.
> > Clear these flags when the netdev comes back up.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel
> > ---
> > include
On 12/31/17 9:14 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Previous patch marked nexthops with the 'dead' and 'linkdown' flags.
> Clear these flags when the netdev comes back up.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel
> ---
> include/net/ip6_route.h | 1 +
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 3 +++
> net/ipv6/route.c
Previous patch marked nexthops with the 'dead' and 'linkdown' flags.
Clear these flags when the netdev comes back up.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel
---
include/net/ip6_route.h | 1 +
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 3 +++
net/ipv6/route.c| 29 +
3 files changed, 33
10 matches
Mail list logo