From: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:58:28 +0200
> On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 08:24 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> > I think its best to use your patch for now and see where this leads to.
>
> Alright, should I repost with a proper [PATCH] subject or is it good to
> take a
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 08:24 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> I think its best to use your patch for now and see where this leads to.
Alright, should I repost with a proper [PATCH] subject or is it good to
take as-is? :)
johannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
t
* Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-09-14 11:21
> On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:14 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> > Looks good, we have to watch the size of struct nla_policy though.
> > This bumps the size from 4 bytes to 16 bytes on 64bit architectures
> > which might become a problem since we al
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:14 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> Looks good, we have to watch the size of struct nla_policy though.
> This bumps the size from 4 bytes to 16 bytes on 64bit architectures
> which might become a problem since we always use ATTR_MAX sized
> arrays.
Yes, I'm aware of that, but
* Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-09-14 09:44
> This patch adds an NLA_CUSTOM_CHECK type for netlink attributes
> in order to be able to centrally define new attribute structures
> instead of having to check these special types in each function
> that uses such an attribute.
>
> nl80211 wil
This patch adds an NLA_CUSTOM_CHECK type for netlink attributes
in order to be able to centrally define new attribute structures
instead of having to check these special types in each function
that uses such an attribute.
nl80211 will benefit from this because it needs an information
element attri
