On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:14 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:

> Looks good, we have to watch the size of struct nla_policy though.
> This bumps the size from 4 bytes to 16 bytes on 64bit architectures
> which might become a problem since we always use ATTR_MAX sized
> arrays.

Yes, I'm aware of that, but I couldn't think of a way to handle it well.

I thought about using a second array containing just the check
functions, and then (ab)using `len' to index into it but that didn't
seem clean enough.

Can you think of something better?

johannes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to