Re: [PATCHv7 1/5] Remove unnecessary locks from rtnetlink (in do_setlink)

2007-12-03 Thread Laszlo Attila Toth
Jarek Poplawski írta: Laszlo Attila Toth wrote, On 11/29/2007 05:11 PM: The do_setlink function is protected by rtnl, additional locks are unnecessary, and the set_operstate() function is called from protected parts. Locks removed from both functions. It doesn't look like in accordance with a

Re: [PATCHv7 1/5] Remove unnecessary locks from rtnetlink (in do_setlink)

2007-11-30 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Laszlo Attila Toth wrote, On 11/29/2007 05:11 PM: > The do_setlink function is protected by rtnl, additional locks are > unnecessary, > and the set_operstate() function is called from protected parts. Locks removed > from both functions. It doesn't look like in accordance with a comment to dev_b

[PATCHv7 1/5] Remove unnecessary locks from rtnetlink (in do_setlink)

2007-11-29 Thread Laszlo Attila Toth
The do_setlink function is protected by rtnl, additional locks are unnecessary, and the set_operstate() function is called from protected parts. Locks removed from both functions. Signed-off-by: Laszlo Attila Toth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/core/rtnetlink.c |4 1 files changed, 0 inser