Laszlo Attila Toth wrote, On 11/29/2007 05:11 PM: > The do_setlink function is protected by rtnl, additional locks are > unnecessary, > and the set_operstate() function is called from protected parts. Locks removed > from both functions.
It doesn't look like in accordance with a comment to dev_base_lock in dev.c. And it makes eg. rfc2863_policy() locking from link_watch.c looking strange. Isn't there needed some additional comment to this? Regards, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
