Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 00/17] bpf: eliminate zero extensions for sub-register writes

2019-05-25 Thread Jiong Wang
Alexei Starovoitov writes: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:25:11PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote: >> v9: >> - Split patch 5 in v8. >> make bpf uapi header file sync a separate patch. (Alexei) > > 9th time's a charm? ;) Yup :), it's all good things and helped us reaching a solution that fits verifi

Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 00/17] bpf: eliminate zero extensions for sub-register writes

2019-05-24 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:25:11PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote: > v9: > - Split patch 5 in v8. > make bpf uapi header file sync a separate patch. (Alexei) 9th time's a charm? ;) Applied. Thanks a lot for all the hard work. It's a great milestone. Please follow up with an optimization for bpf_p

[PATCH v9 bpf-next 00/17] bpf: eliminate zero extensions for sub-register writes

2019-05-24 Thread Jiong Wang
v9: - Split patch 5 in v8. make bpf uapi header file sync a separate patch. (Alexei) v8: - For stack slot read, mark them as REG_LIVE_READ64. (Alexei) - Change DEF_NOT_SUBREG from -1 to 0. (Alexei) - Rebased on top of latest bpf-next. v7: - Drop the first patch in v6, the one adding