Alexei Starovoitov writes:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:25:11PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote: >> v9: >> - Split patch 5 in v8. >> make bpf uapi header file sync a separate patch. (Alexei) > > 9th time's a charm? ;) Yup :), it's all good things and helped us reaching a solution that fits verifier's existing infra. > Applied. > Thanks a lot for all the hard work. > It's a great milestone. Thanks. And I guess the answer to the question: "Q: BPF 32-bit subregister requirements" inside Documentation/bpf/bpf_design_QA.rst now could be updated to mention LLVM and JIT back-ends 32-bit supports, will send out an update on this. > Please follow up with an optimization for bpf_patch_insn_data() > to make it scaleable and undo that workaround in scale tests. Sure, will do. Regards, Jiong
