On 24/07/2020 21:32, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Edward,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Edward-Cree/sfc-driver-for-EF100-family-NICs-part-1/20200725-000401
> base: https://gi
Hi Edward,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Edward-Cree/sfc-driver-for-EF100-family-NICs-part-1/20200725-000401
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
1b6
Hi Edward,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Edward-Cree/sfc-driver-for-EF100-family-NICs-part-1/20200725-000401
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
1b6
No TX or RX path, no MCDI, not even an ifup/down handler.
Besides stubs, the bulk of the patch deals with reading the Xilinx
extended PCIe capability, which tells us where to find our BAR.
Though in the same module, EF100 has its own struct pci_driver,
which is named sfc_ef100.
A small number o
