On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 09:05:34PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> As it says in rfc6525#section5.1.4, before sending the request,
>
>C2: The sender has either no outstanding TSNs or considers all
> outstanding TSNs abandoned.
>
> Prior to this patch, it tried to consider all outstanding TS
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:06 PM, David Laight wrote:
> From: Xin Long
>> Sent: 25 November 2017 13:06
>>
>> As it says in rfc6525#section5.1.4, before sending the request,
>>
>>C2: The sender has either no outstanding TSNs or considers all
>> outstanding TSNs abandoned.
>>
>> Prior to
From: Xin Long
> Sent: 25 November 2017 13:06
>
> As it says in rfc6525#section5.1.4, before sending the request,
>
>C2: The sender has either no outstanding TSNs or considers all
> outstanding TSNs abandoned.
>
> Prior to this patch, it tried to consider all outstanding TSNs abando
As it says in rfc6525#section5.1.4, before sending the request,
C2: The sender has either no outstanding TSNs or considers all
outstanding TSNs abandoned.
Prior to this patch, it tried to consider all outstanding TSNs abandoned
by dropping all chunks in all outqs with sctp_outq_free (