On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 08:56:10AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:03:20 +0100 Antonio Cardace wrote:
> > Do I have to resend the whole serie as a new version or is there a
> > quicker way to just resend a single patch?
>
> Just repost the series as v5, it's the least confusi
On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:03:20 +0100 Antonio Cardace wrote:
> Do I have to resend the whole serie as a new version or is there a
> quicker way to just resend a single patch?
Just repost the series as v5, it's the least confusing way.
Changelog from version to version would be good. You can put
it i
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:35:20PM +0100, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Antonio Cardace wrote:
> > As pointed out by Michal Kubecek, getting the name
> > with the previous approach was racy, it's better
> > and easier to get the name of the device with this
> > p
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 04:20:14PM +0100, Antonio Cardace wrote:
> As pointed out by Michal Kubecek, getting the name
> with the previous approach was racy, it's better
> and easier to get the name of the device with this
> patch's approach.
>
> Essentialy the function doesn't need to exist
> anym
As pointed out by Michal Kubecek, getting the name
with the previous approach was racy, it's better
and easier to get the name of the device with this
patch's approach.
Essentialy the function doesn't need to exist
anymore as it's a simple 'ls' command.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Cardace
---
.../dr
