From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:55:31 -0800
> PHY drivers should be able to rely on the caller of {get,set}_tunable to
> have acquired the PHY device mutex, in order to both serialize against
> concurrent calls of these functions, but also against PHY state machine
> changes. All
On 22/11/16 13:55, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>
>
> PHY drivers should be able to rely on the caller of {get,set}_tunable to
> have acquired the PHY device mutex, in order to both serialize against
> concurrent calls of these functions, but also against PHY state machine
> changes.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:55:31PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> PHY drivers should be able to rely on the caller of {get,set}_tunable to
> have acquired the PHY device mutex, in order to both serialize against
> concurrent calls of these functions, but also against PHY state machine
> changes.
PHY drivers should be able to rely on the caller of {get,set}_tunable to
have acquired the PHY device mutex, in order to both serialize against
concurrent calls of these functions, but also against PHY state machine
changes. All ethtool PHY-level functions do this, except
{get,set}_tunable, so we m
