Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] cls_api: add flow_indr_block_call function

2019-08-04 Thread wenxu
v5 contain this patch but with non-version tag, I used --subject-prefix in git-format-patch. I am sorry to  make a mistake when modify the commit log. So should I repost the v6? On 8/5/2019 2:02 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Re subject. You don't have "v5" in this patch. I don't understand how > tha

Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] cls_api: add flow_indr_block_call function

2019-08-04 Thread Jiri Pirko
Re subject. You don't have "v5" in this patch. I don't understand how that happened. Do you use --subject-prefix in git-format-patch?

[PATCH net-next 3/6] cls_api: add flow_indr_block_call function

2019-07-31 Thread wenxu
From: wenxu This patch make indr_block_call don't access struct tc_indr_block_cb and tc_indr_block_dev directly Signed-off-by: wenxu --- v5: new patch net/sched/cls_api.c | 33 - 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.

[PATCH net-next 3/6] cls_api: add flow_indr_block_call function

2019-07-31 Thread wenxu
From: wenxu This patch make indr_block_call don't access struct tc_indr_block_cb and tc_indr_block_dev directly Signed-off-by: wenxu --- net/sched/cls_api.c | 33 - 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/c