Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] PCI: let pci_disable_link_state propagate errors

From: Heiner Kallweit Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:12:56 +0200 > Drivers like r8169 rely on pci_disable_link_state() having disabled > certain ASPM link states. If OS can't control ASPM then > pci_disable_link_state() turns into a no-op w/o informing the caller. > The driver therefore may falsely as

Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] PCI: let pci_disable_link_state propagate errors

From: Heiner Kallweit Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:12:56 +0200 > Drivers like r8169 rely on pci_disable_link_state() having disabled > certain ASPM link states. If OS can't control ASPM then > pci_disable_link_state() turns into a no-op w/o informing the caller. > The driver therefore may falsely as

[PATCH net-next 0/2] PCI: let pci_disable_link_state propagate errors

Drivers like r8169 rely on pci_disable_link_state() having disabled certain ASPM link states. If OS can't control ASPM then pci_disable_link_state() turns into a no-op w/o informing the caller. The driver therefore may falsely assume the respective ASPM link states are disabled. Let pci_disable_lin