From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallwe...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 23:12:56 +0200
> Drivers like r8169 rely on pci_disable_link_state() having disabled > certain ASPM link states. If OS can't control ASPM then > pci_disable_link_state() turns into a no-op w/o informing the caller. > The driver therefore may falsely assume the respective ASPM link > states are disabled. Let pci_disable_link_state() propagate errors > to the caller, enabling the caller to react accordingly. > > I'd propose to let this series go through the netdev tree if the PCI > core extension is acked by the PCI people. Series applied, thanks Heiner.
