On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 09:56:44PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Eric Garver wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:57:46PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Eric Garver wrote:
> >> > CSMU6_RX is relevant for collect_metadata as wel
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Eric Garver wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:57:46PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Eric Garver wrote:
>> > CSMU6_RX is relevant for collect_metadata as well. As such leave it
>> > outside of the dev's IPv4/IPv6 checks.
>> >
>>
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:57:46PM -0700, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Eric Garver wrote:
> > CSMU6_RX is relevant for collect_metadata as well. As such leave it
> > outside of the dev's IPv4/IPv6 checks.
> >
> Can you explain it bit? is this flag used with ipv4 tunnels
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Eric Garver wrote:
> CSMU6_RX is relevant for collect_metadata as well. As such leave it
> outside of the dev's IPv4/IPv6 checks.
>
Can you explain it bit? is this flag used with ipv4 tunnels?
> Fixes: 9b4437a5b870 ("geneve: Unify LWT and netdev handling.")
> Sig
CSMU6_RX is relevant for collect_metadata as well. As such leave it
outside of the dev's IPv4/IPv6 checks.
Fixes: 9b4437a5b870 ("geneve: Unify LWT and netdev handling.")
Signed-off-by: Eric Garver
---
drivers/net/geneve.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git