From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_gov...@gmx.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:56:17 +0530 (IST)
> Let me know if this change is OK, I will send new patch with detailed
> description.
Yes, and please do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, David Miller wrote:
From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_gov...@gmx.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 21:47:50 +0530
-static inline bool enic_poll_unlock_napi(struct vnic_rq *rq)
+static inline void enic_poll_unlock_napi(struct vnic_rq *rq,
+
From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_gov...@gmx.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 21:47:50 +0530
> -static inline bool enic_poll_unlock_napi(struct vnic_rq *rq)
> +static inline void enic_poll_unlock_napi(struct vnic_rq *rq,
> + struct napi_struct *napi)
> {
> - bo
We use spinlock to access a single flag. We can achieve this by using atomic
variable and atomic_cmpxchg to set the flag (idle to poll) and a simple atomic
set to unlock (poll to idle).
Also flush gro before unlocking napi poll, to prevent ooo packets when busy poll
sockets are called.
Signed-off
