From: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_gov...@gmx.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 21:47:50 +0530

> -static inline bool enic_poll_unlock_napi(struct vnic_rq *rq)
> +static inline void enic_poll_unlock_napi(struct vnic_rq *rq,
> +                                      struct napi_struct *napi)
>  {
> -     bool rc = false;
> -
> -     spin_lock(&rq->bpoll_lock);
> -     WARN_ON(rq->bpoll_state &
> -             (ENIC_POLL_STATE_POLL | ENIC_POLL_STATE_NAPI_YIELD));
> -     if (rq->bpoll_state & ENIC_POLL_STATE_POLL_YIELD)
> -             rc = true;
> -     rq->bpoll_state = ENIC_POLL_STATE_IDLE;
> -     spin_unlock(&rq->bpoll_lock);
> -
> -     return rc;
> +     WARN_ON(atomic_read(&rq->bpoll_state) != ENIC_POLL_STATE_NAPI);
> +     napi_gro_flush(napi, false);
> +     atomic_set(&rq->bpoll_state, ENIC_POLL_STATE_IDLE);
>  }

I don't understand why you needed to add this napi_gro_flush() call here,
and regardless of the reason you must explain this, in detail, in your
commit message,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to