From: Teng Qin
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 03:17:31 +
> Alexei said it was due to Clang not taking u64, u32 etc. for compilation.
> I didn’t know the context and just used them. But apparently, something
> changed and now they build and run OK..
These types are %100 compiler agnostic. Clang
On 5/22/17, 20:08, "David Miller" wrote:
From: Teng Qin
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 00:39:34 +
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> index 9a9c95f..a94ce42 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
From: Teng Qin
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 00:39:34 +
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> index 9a9c95f..a94ce42 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h
> @@ -37,9 +37,8 @@ static int (*bpf_clone_redirect)(void *ctx, int ifindex
From: Teng Qin
This commit updates function signature of the bpf_perf_event_output and
bpf_perf_event_read helpers to match their implementation. Also updates
their documentation in the header files.
Signed-off-by: Teng Qin
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov
---
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 11
