From: Teng Qin <qint...@fb.com> Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 00:39:34 +0000
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h > index 9a9c95f..a94ce42 100644 > --- a/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h > +++ b/samples/bpf/bpf_helpers.h > @@ -37,9 +37,8 @@ static int (*bpf_clone_redirect)(void *ctx, int ifindex, > int flags) = > (void *) BPF_FUNC_clone_redirect; > static int (*bpf_redirect)(int ifindex, int flags) = > (void *) BPF_FUNC_redirect; > -static int (*bpf_perf_event_output)(void *ctx, void *map, > - unsigned long long flags, void *data, > - int size) = > +static int (*bpf_perf_event_output)(void *ctx, void *map, u64 flags, > + void *data, int size) = > (void *) BPF_FUNC_perf_event_output; > static int (*bpf_get_stackid)(void *ctx, void *map, int flags) = > (void *) BPF_FUNC_get_stackid; I think we've been intentionally avoiding the use of "u64", "u32", etc. in this file. But what do I know.
