Hi Andrew,
On 31/12/18 11:47 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Having so many front end drivers for a chipset should be done in a
more modular manner, so that in fact they could all coexist if
necessary.
Not sure I follow your meaning ... are you suggesting to allow the back end
driver to use run-time sel
> >Having so many front end drivers for a chipset should be done in a
> >more modular manner, so that in fact they could all coexist if
> >necessary.
>
> Not sure I follow your meaning ... are you suggesting to allow the back end
> driver to use run-time selectable IO accessors and other generic h
Hi Dave,
Am 29.12.2018 um 09:43 schrieb David Miller:
From: Michael Schmitz
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 10:30:58 +1300
Am 21.12.2018 um 13:10 schrieb David Miller:
And in particular this huge complicated Kconfig construct is not
maintainable at all.
We can trim this down a bit (for reasons I've
From: Michael Schmitz
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 10:30:58 +1300
> Am 21.12.2018 um 13:10 schrieb David Miller:
>> And in particular this huge complicated Kconfig construct is not
>> maintainable at all.
>
> We can trim this down a bit (for reasons I've outlined before):
>
> +if APNE
> +config APNE1
Dave,
Am 21.12.2018 um 13:10 schrieb David Miller:
From: ALeX Kazik
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:24:32 +0100
+ bool "PCMCIA NE2000 100MBit support"
+ default n
+ depends on ARM_ETHERH=n && AX88796=n && HYDRA=n && MAC8390=n
+ depends on MCF8390=n && NE2000=n && NE2K_PCI=n
From: ALeX Kazik
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:24:32 +0100
> + bool "PCMCIA NE2000 100MBit support"
> + default n
> + depends on ARM_ETHERH=n && AX88796=n && HYDRA=n && MAC8390=n
> + depends on MCF8390=n && NE2000=n && NE2K_PCI=n && PCMCIA_AXNET=n
> + depends on PCMCIA_PCNET=n &&
This adds an option to change the (10 MBit only) "apne" driver to support
the 10/100 Mbit cards (e.g. Netgear FA411, CNet Singlepoint) instead.
A new configure option is added as a bool to the apne driver to change the
behaviour to support some new cards instead.
The option can be only enabled if
