Re: [PATCH net] mscc: Register poll timeout should be wall time not attempts

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:11:50PM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote: > The 12/20/2018 11:31, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:08:16AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote: > > > When doing indirect access in the Ocelot chip, a command is setup, > > > issued and then we need to poll until the res

Re: [PATCH net] mscc: Register poll timeout should be wall time not attempts

The 12/20/2018 11:31, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:08:16AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote: > > When doing indirect access in the Ocelot chip, a command is setup, > > issued and then we need to poll until the result is ready. The polling > > timeout is specified in milliseconds in th

Re: [PATCH net] mscc: Register poll timeout should be wall time not attempts

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:08:16AM +0100, Steen Hegelund wrote: > When doing indirect access in the Ocelot chip, a command is setup, > issued and then we need to poll until the result is ready. The polling > timeout is specified in milliseconds in the datasheet and not in > register access attempts

Re: [PATCH net] mscc: Register poll timeout should be wall time not attempts

On 20/12/2018 10:08:16+0100, Steen Hegelund wrote: > When doing indirect access in the Ocelot chip, a command is setup, > issued and then we need to poll until the result is ready. The polling > timeout is specified in milliseconds in the datasheet and not in > register access attempts. > > Signed

[PATCH net] mscc: Register poll timeout should be wall time not attempts

When doing indirect access in the Ocelot chip, a command is setup, issued and then we need to poll until the result is ready. The polling timeout is specified in milliseconds in the datasheet and not in register access attempts. Signed-off-by: Steen Hegelund --- drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.