On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 06:06:58PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/15/19 6:03 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> > Thanks Martin.
> > Changing __rt6_find_exception_xxx() might not be easy cause other
> > callers of this function does not really need to back off and use
> > another saddr.
> > And the validation
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 5:07 PM David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 5/15/19 6:03 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> > Thanks Martin.
> > Changing __rt6_find_exception_xxx() might not be easy cause other
> > callers of this function does not really need to back off and use
> > another saddr.
> > And the validation of the
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:51 PM Martin Lau wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 05:46:10PM -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> > From: Wei Wang
> >
> > When inserting route cache into the exception table, the key is
> > generated with both src_addr and dest_addr with src addr routing.
> > However, current log
On 5/15/19 6:03 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> Thanks Martin.
> Changing __rt6_find_exception_xxx() might not be easy cause other
> callers of this function does not really need to back off and use
> another saddr.
> And the validation of the result is a bit different for different callers.
> What about add
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 05:46:10PM -0700, Wei Wang wrote:
> From: Wei Wang
>
> When inserting route cache into the exception table, the key is
> generated with both src_addr and dest_addr with src addr routing.
> However, current logic always assumes the src_addr used to generate the
> key is a /
On 5/15/19 11:45 AM, Wei Wang wrote:
>>
>> you have to pass in a device. The first line in ip6_del_cached_rt:
>>
>> if (cfg->fc_ifindex && rt->dst.dev->ifindex != cfg->fc_ifindex)
>> goto out;
>>
>> 'ip route get' is one way to check if it has been deleted. We really
>> need to add
From: David Ahern
Date: Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:33 AM
To: Wei Wang
Cc: Wei Wang, David Miller, Linux Kernel Network Developers, Martin
KaFai Lau, Mikael Magnusson, Eric Dumazet
> On 5/15/19 11:28 AM, Wei Wang wrote:
> > From: Wei Wang
> > Date: Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:25 AM
> > To: David Ahern
>
On 5/15/19 11:28 AM, Wei Wang wrote:
> From: Wei Wang
> Date: Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:25 AM
> To: David Ahern
> Cc: Wei Wang, David Miller, Linux Kernel Network Developers, Martin
> KaFai Lau, Mikael Magnusson, Eric Dumazet
>
>>>
>>> What about rt6_remove_exception_rt?
>>>
>>> You can add a 'cach
From: Wei Wang
Date: Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:25 AM
To: David Ahern
Cc: Wei Wang, David Miller, Linux Kernel Network Developers, Martin
KaFai Lau, Mikael Magnusson, Eric Dumazet
> >
> > What about rt6_remove_exception_rt?
> >
> > You can add a 'cache' hook to ip/iproute.c to delete the cached rout
>
> What about rt6_remove_exception_rt?
>
> You can add a 'cache' hook to ip/iproute.c to delete the cached routes
> and verify that it works. I seem to have misplaced my patch to do it.
I don't think rt6_remove_exception_rt() needs any change.
It is because it gets the route cache rt6_info as the
On 5/15/19 9:56 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> You can add a 'cache' hook to ip/iproute.c to delete the cached routes
> and verify that it works. I seem to have misplaced my patch to do it.
found it.
From 7a328753a93321a07a5228fb32ed881d82d7a537 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Ahern
Date: Mon, 6 M
On 5/14/19 6:46 PM, Wei Wang wrote:
> From: Wei Wang
>
> When inserting route cache into the exception table, the key is
> generated with both src_addr and dest_addr with src addr routing.
> However, current logic always assumes the src_addr used to generate the
> key is a /128 host address. This
From: Wei Wang
When inserting route cache into the exception table, the key is
generated with both src_addr and dest_addr with src addr routing.
However, current logic always assumes the src_addr used to generate the
key is a /128 host address. This is not true in the following scenarios:
1. When
13 matches
Mail list logo
