On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 5:07 PM David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 5/15/19 6:03 PM, Wei Wang wrote: > > Thanks Martin. > > Changing __rt6_find_exception_xxx() might not be easy cause other > > callers of this function does not really need to back off and use > > another saddr. > > And the validation of the result is a bit different for different callers. > > What about add a new helper for the above 2 cases and just call that > > from both places? > > Since this needs to be backported to stable releases, I would say > simplest patch for that is best. > > I have changes queued for this area once net-next opens; I can look at > consolidating as part of that.
Thanks David... In that case, I would prefer to stick with the current version. Martin, what do you think?
