On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:59:03PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:13:10AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:44:51AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:27 PM, David Miller
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:13:10AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:44:51AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
> >> > From: Martin KaFai Lau
> >> > Date: Fri, 18 Aug 201
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:44:51AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Martin KaFai Lau
>> > Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:51:36 -0700
>> >
>> >> It seems like that middle box specifically
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:44:51AM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Martin KaFai Lau
> > Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:51:36 -0700
> >
> >> It seems like that middle box specifically drops TCP_RST if it
> >> does not know anything about this f
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:01:53PM -0800, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >>
> > We're now seeing several router vendors recommending people to not use
> > flow labels for ECMP hashing. This is precisely because when a flow
> > label changes, network devic
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Martin KaFai Lau
>> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:51:36 -0700
>>
>>> It seems like that middle box specifically drops TCP_RST if it
>>> does not know anything about this flow. Since th
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 3:27 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:51:36 -0700
>
>> It seems like that middle box specifically drops TCP_RST if it
>> does not know anything about this flow. Since the flowlabel of the TCP_RST
>> (sent in TW state) is always
From: Martin KaFai Lau
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:51:36 -0700
> It seems like that middle box specifically drops TCP_RST if it
> does not know anything about this flow. Since the flowlabel of the TCP_RST
> (sent in TW state) is always different, it always lands to a different middle
> box. All o
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 07:50:03AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> > We had been using the auto_flowlabels=1 (i.e. essentially enable flowlabel)
> > mainly because we want to take the benefit of dst_negative_advice() when
> > tcp_write_timeout() happens.
> >
> > During our test, our system handles quit
> We had been using the auto_flowlabels=1 (i.e. essentially enable flowlabel)
> mainly because we want to take the benefit of dst_negative_advice() when
> tcp_write_timeout() happens.
>
> During our test, our system handles quite well with changing flowlabel.
> The only exception we have hit is the
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:15:46PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:08:31AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:00:20PM -0700, Tom Herbert w
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:15:46PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:08:31AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> >
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:15:46PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:08:31AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:00:20PM -0700, Tom Herbert w
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:08:31AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:00:20PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> >
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 07:08:31AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:00:20PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:30:51AM -0700, Tom Herbert
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:00:20PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:30:51AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> >
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:00:20PM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:30:51AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:40:08AM -0700, Tom Herbert
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:30:51AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:40:08AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> >
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:30:51AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:40:08AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >> > From: Shaohua Li
> >> >
> >> > Please see below tcpdum
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:40:08AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
>> > From: Shaohua Li
>> >
>> > Please see below tcpdump output:
>> > 21:00:48.109122 IP6 (flowlabel 0x43304, hlim 64, next-head
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 09:40:08AM -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > From: Shaohua Li
> >
> > Please see below tcpdump output:
> > 21:00:48.109122 IP6 (flowlabel 0x43304, hlim 64, next-header TCP (6)
> > payload length: 40) fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456
From: Shaohua Li
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 07:59:53 -0700
> Could you please look at the patches?
If you actually looked in patchwork, the state of your patches is
"changes requested".
This means that you were given feedback asking to change something
about your patches, which means that a new subm
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li
>
> Please see below tcpdump output:
> 21:00:48.109122 IP6 (flowlabel 0x43304, hlim 64, next-header TCP (6) payload
> length: 40) fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.55804 > fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.:
> Flags [S], cksum 0x0529 (incorr
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 03:19:21PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li
>
> Please see below tcpdump output:
> 21:00:48.109122 IP6 (flowlabel 0x43304, hlim 64, next-header TCP (6) payload
> length: 40) fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.55804 > fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.:
> Flags [S], cksum 0x052
From: Shaohua Li
Please see below tcpdump output:
21:00:48.109122 IP6 (flowlabel 0x43304, hlim 64, next-header TCP (6) payload
length: 40) fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.55804 > fec0::5054:ff:fe12:3456.: Flags
[S], cksum 0x0529 (incorrect -> 0xf56c), seq 3282214508, win 43690, options
[mss 65476,
25 matches
Mail list logo