On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 17:43 -0500, Michael Wu wrote:
> But bcm43xx sets ethtool ops through bcm43xx_netdev_setup. Why not have
> rt2x00
> do the same?
Actually, look closer. I removed bcm43xx_netdev_setup as well as the
setup() callback for the hw as well as the bcm43xx ethtool ops which
were
On Thursday 02 November 2006 17:39, Johannes Berg wrote:
> After removing knowledge of the master net_dev from drivers,
> some will still want to have ethtool ops assigned (rt2x00 uses
> it). This is that way.
But bcm43xx sets ethtool ops through bcm43xx_netdev_setup. Why not have rt2x00
do the sa
