On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:39:17AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Sound fair. Could you Ack the following? Then I'll resend all the
> patches that have an ack.
> I've realised that the "further improve stability of rhashtable_walk"
> patch isn't actually complete, so I'll withdraw that for now.
Loo
On Thu, Apr 19 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:56:28AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> I don't want to do that - I just want the documentation to be correct
>> (or at least, not be blatantly incorrect). The function does not sleep,
>> and is safe to call with spin locks held.
>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:56:28AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> I don't want to do that - I just want the documentation to be correct
> (or at least, not be blatantly incorrect). The function does not sleep,
> and is safe to call with spin locks held.
> Do we need to spell out when it can be called
On Wed, Apr 18 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:47:01PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> Neither rhashtable_walk_enter() or rhltable_walk_enter() sleep, so
>> remove the comments which suggest that they do.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
>> ---
>> include/linux/rhashtable.h |3
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:47:01PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Neither rhashtable_walk_enter() or rhltable_walk_enter() sleep, so
> remove the comments which suggest that they do.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
> ---
> include/linux/rhashtable.h |3 ---
> lib/rhashtable.c |3 ---
>
Neither rhashtable_walk_enter() or rhltable_walk_enter() sleep, so
remove the comments which suggest that they do.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
---
include/linux/rhashtable.h |3 ---
lib/rhashtable.c |3 ---
2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rhashtable.h b
Neither rhashtable_walk_enter() or rhltable_walk_enter() sleep, so
remove the comments which suggest that they do.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
---
include/linux/rhashtable.h |3 ---
lib/rhashtable.c |3 ---
2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rhashtable.h b
