On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:39:17AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Sound fair. Could you Ack the following? Then I'll resend all the
> patches that have an ack.
> I've realised that the "further improve stability of rhashtable_walk"
> patch isn't actually complete, so I'll withdraw that for now.
Looks good to me.
> From e16c037398b6c057787437f3a0aaa7fd44c3bee3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:05:39 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] rhashtable: Revise incorrect comment on
> r{hl,hash}table_walk_enter()
>
> Neither rhashtable_walk_enter() or rhltable_walk_enter() sleep, though
> they do take a spinlock without irq protection.
> So revise the comments to accurately state the contexts in which
> these functions can be called.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <ne...@suse.com>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
