On Wednesday 13 December 2006 18:05, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:47:41PM +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > Do you need to actually write data to the eeprom chip?
> > Currently the module does not support writing to the eeprom,
> > this is something I could add (The original R
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 05:47:41PM +0100, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> Do you need to actually write data to the eeprom chip?
> Currently the module does not support writing to the eeprom,
> this is something I could add (The original Ralink code, where this module
> is based on also contains the code to
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 16:44, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:05:06PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> > Nope, don't have that device. I'll create a patch that will place the eeprom
> > module in the /lib folder. I'll send that to the list as soon as possible.
>
> Hmm, I w
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:05:06PM +0100, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> Nope, don't have that device. I'll create a patch that will place the eeprom
> module in the /lib folder. I'll send that to the list as soon as possible.
Hmm, I wonder if this will be of help for me trying to read/write a
93c46 conne
Hi
> I have checked the adm80211 code as well, it seems to behave quite the
> same, with the most notable difference the fact that adm80211 writes the
> READ_OPCODE and the word index within a single command, while in
> eeprom_93cx6 this is split into 2 seperate write commands.
> I have not yet
On Friday 08 December 2006 13:56, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> I have checked the adm80211 code as well, it seems to behave quite the
> same, with the most notable difference the fact that adm80211 writes the
> READ_OPCODE and the word index within a single command, while in
> eeprom_93cx6 this is split
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:39, Michael Wu wrote:
> On Sunday 03 December 2006 13:19, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > rt2400pci, rt2500pci and rt61pci share exactly the
> > same code for the eeprom reading. The only difference
> > is that rt61pci has a slightly different register reading
> > approach. I
On Sunday 03 December 2006 19:39, Michael Wu wrote:
> On Sunday 03 December 2006 13:19, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> > rt2400pci, rt2500pci and rt61pci share exactly the
> > same code for the eeprom reading. The only difference
> > is that rt61pci has a slightly different register reading
> > approach. I
On Sunday 03 December 2006 13:19, Ivo van Doorn wrote:
> rt2400pci, rt2500pci and rt61pci share exactly the
> same code for the eeprom reading. The only difference
> is that rt61pci has a slightly different register reading
> approach. In any case we have a lot of duplicate code.
> Create a new mod
rt2400pci, rt2500pci and rt61pci share exactly the
same code for the eeprom reading. The only difference
is that rt61pci has a slightly different register reading
approach. In any case we have a lot of duplicate code.
Create a new module eeprom_93cx6 inside the rt2x00 folder
and make rt2x00 use tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
