From: Wei Yongjun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 20:36:14 -0400
> I had tested the patch under linux system, maybe this mail is correct.
>
> Fix error point to options in ip_options_fragment(). optptr get a error
> pointer to the ipv4 header, correct is pointer to ipv4 options.
>
> S
I had tested the patch under linux system, maybe this mail is correct.
Fix error point to options in ip_options_fragment(). optptr get a error
pointer to the ipv4 header, correct is pointer to ipv4 options.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_options.c 2006-01-27
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:50:02 -0400
> Does this patch will be used?
>
> This patch resolved the following problem: When I send IPv4 packet(contain
> Record Route Option) which need to be fragmented to the router, the router
> can not fragment it correctly. After fragme
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:50:02 -0400
> Does this patch will be used?
Your patch is in the tree already.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordo
Hello Mr. David:
Does this patch will be used?
This patch resolved the following problem: When I send IPv4 packet(contain
Record Route Option) which need to be fragmented to the router, the router
can not fragment it correctly. After fragmented by router, the second
fragmentation still contai
From: Wei Yongjun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:21:41 -0500
> Resend Patch:
> --- linux-2.6.15.1/net/ipv4/ip_options.c.orig 2006-01-27
> 09:14:33.463612696 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.15.1/net/ipv4/ip_options.c 2006-01-27 09:12:21.857619848
> +0900
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
>
> void
Resend Patch:
--- linux-2.6.15.1/net/ipv4/ip_options.c.orig 2006-01-27
09:14:33.463612696 +0900
+++ linux-2.6.15.1/net/ipv4/ip_options.c2006-01-27 09:12:21.857619848
+0900
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@
void ip_options_fragment(struct sk_buff * skb)
{
- unsigned char * optptr = skb->nh.ra
From: "Wei Yongjun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:35:02 -0800
> [1]Summary of the problem:
> ip_options_fragment() has no effect on fragmentation
>
> [2]Full description of the problem:
> When I send IPv4 packet(contain Record Route Option) which need to be
> fragmented to the rou
[1]Summary of the problem:
ip_options_fragment() has no effect on fragmentation
[2]Full description of the problem:
When I send IPv4 packet(contain Record Route Option) which need to be
fragmented to the router, the router can not fragment it correctly.
After fragmented by router, the second frag
